Back to Skills
    šŸ¦ž

    pre-mortem-analyst

    Imagine the project already failed, then work

    By @artyomx33
    View on GitHub
    SKILL.md
    ---
    name: pre-mortem-analyst
    description: Imagine the project already failed, then work backward to find why. More powerful than risk assessment because it assumes failure is certain. Use when user says "pre-mortem", "premortem", "imagine this failed", "what could go wrong", "risk analysis", "before we launch", "stress test", "what would kill this", "project risks".
    ---
    
    # Pre-Mortem Analyst
    
    ## Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment
    
    **Risk Assessment:** "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers
    **Pre-Mortem:** "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis
    
    Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.
    
    ## The Process
    
    1. **Set the scene:** "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
    2. **Brainstorm causes:** List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
    3. **Categorize:** People, Process, Technology, External
    4. **Rate:** Likelihood Ɨ Impact (H/M/L)
    5. **Prevent:** Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
    6. **Monitor:** Define early warning signs
    
    ## Output Format
    
    ```
    PROJECT: [Name]
    FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."
    
    WHY IT FAILED:
    
    šŸ‘„ PEOPLE: [Cause] - LƗI: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
    āš™ļø PROCESS: [Cause] - LƗI: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
    šŸ’» TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - LƗI: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
    šŸŒ EXTERNAL: [Cause] - LƗI: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
    
    TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
    1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
    2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
    3. [Risk] → [Specific action]
    
    WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
    ā–” [Early indicator 1]
    ā–” [Early indicator 2]
    ```
    
    ## Common Failure Categories
    
    | Category | Common Causes |
    |----------|---------------|
    | **People** | Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in |
    | **Process** | Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues |
    | **Tech** | Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach |
    | **External** | Market shift, competitor move, regulation change |
    
    ## Integration
    
    Compounds with:
    - **inversion-strategist** → Create systematic avoidance strategies
    - **second-order-consequences** → Project impact of prevented failures
    - **first-principles-decomposer** → Question hidden assumptions
    - **mspot-generator** → Validate MSPOT projects before committing
    
    ---
    See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems